I see that there is talked about a head of the hierarchy, but there is no thesis explaining what is the hierarchy.. Is theosophy talking about different planetary Initiations? There is a verse in the Bible about John the Baptist that he is of a very high status, but still the ones of the lowest level in heaven is higher then him. I see in this different spiritual status in heaven.
If what Leadbeater and Alice Bailey wrote about the spiritual hierarchy is wrong information, please tell about the spiritual hierarchy without attacking other writers.
It’s difficult to see how simple statements of fact, such as those in the closing paragraphs of the above article, can be considered as “attacks” against the writers/teachers referred to. Everything we have said about Leadbeater, Bailey, and so on, is provable.
On the contrary, it is THEIR work which consists – by means of deliberate deception, distortion, and dilution – of an attack against genuine Theosophy and the real teachings of the real Masters. A thorough reading of the article “Tibetan Master or Christian Priest? (Uncovering the real inspiration behind the Alice Bailey Books)” at https://blavatskytheosophy.com/tibetan-master-or-christian-priest/ makes this quite clear…at least for anyone except closed-minded Bailey followers with a pronounced Christian bias.
HPB, in her article “On Pseudo-Theosophy,” encouraged all sincere students to expose what she called “the false prophets of Theosophy” and this is all we are doing when criticising such people.
To answer your question about why we haven’t provided a thesis or explanation giving the right information and details about the Hierarchy of Masters and Adepts, the reason we haven’t done so is because the real Masters have never made such information available. What reason would they have for doing so and what business is it of ours? Why would they divulge such extremely sacred and secret information and put it in books available to the whole world? This is a central part of the emphasis of Pseudo-Theosophy; it has nothing to do with Genuine Theosophy and one can find no such emphasis or focus in the work and writings of H.P. Blavatsky.
Although the original teachings of Theosophy refer at times to the fact that there ARE Masters, Mahatmas, Adepts, and Initiates, who are the guardians and custodians of the Esoteric Doctrine and its timeless truths, the emphasis is always without fail on the Philosophy itself and not on the Masters.
Neither HPB, WQJ, nor the Masters themselves, ever divulged details and information about the roles, tasks, locations, past lives, hierarchical positions, levels, and grades of initiation of the Masters. Certain later teachers and writers did exactly this, including drawing up and publishing complex charts and diagrams which purport to show the inner workings of the hierarchical structure of the Great Brotherhood of Masters.
They also published detailed accounts of the physical appearances of the Masters and some described their supposed meetings and intimate friendliness with some of these Masters, whilst at the same time inventing various “new” Masters who are not found described or referred to in those positions in the original Theosophical literature, such as the “Master Jesus,” “The Venetian,” “Master R.,” “Master P.,” “Master Jupiter,” etc.
There was also the insertion of Sanat Kumara as “The Great King, the Lord of the World,” the distortion of the true nature and role of the Maha Chohan, the anthropomorphisation of the Manu, and the exalting of “Christ-Maitreya” to the position of Master over the other Masters, who are frequently described as being the faithful “servants and disciples of Christ” and favouring ritualism, ceremonial, and the Christian Church, whilst Buddha is pushed well into the background, along with genuine Eastern esotericism.
Original Theosophy does not revolve around a cult of the Masters nor their supposed pictures and portraits but rather around the life-giving, soul-satisfying, all-encompassing Esoteric Philosophy and Spiritual Science which the actual Masters gave to the world in the closing quarter of the 19th century through the one they called their “Direct Agent,” H.P. Blavatsky.
T H E O S O P H Y 
I see that there is talked about a head of the hierarchy, but there is no thesis explaining what is the hierarchy.. Is theosophy talking about different planetary Initiations? There is a verse in the Bible about John the Baptist that he is of a very high status, but still the ones of the lowest level in heaven is higher then him. I see in this different spiritual status in heaven.
If what Leadbeater and Alice Bailey wrote about the spiritual hierarchy is wrong information, please tell about the spiritual hierarchy without attacking other writers.
It’s difficult to see how simple statements of fact, such as those in the closing paragraphs of the above article, can be considered as “attacks” against the writers/teachers referred to. Everything we have said about Leadbeater, Bailey, and so on, is provable.
On the contrary, it is THEIR work which consists – by means of deliberate deception, distortion, and dilution – of an attack against genuine Theosophy and the real teachings of the real Masters. A thorough reading of the article “Tibetan Master or Christian Priest? (Uncovering the real inspiration behind the Alice Bailey Books)” at https://blavatskytheosophy.com/tibetan-master-or-christian-priest/ makes this quite clear…at least for anyone except closed-minded Bailey followers with a pronounced Christian bias.
HPB, in her article “On Pseudo-Theosophy,” encouraged all sincere students to expose what she called “the false prophets of Theosophy” and this is all we are doing when criticising such people.
To answer your question about why we haven’t provided a thesis or explanation giving the right information and details about the Hierarchy of Masters and Adepts, the reason we haven’t done so is because the real Masters have never made such information available. What reason would they have for doing so and what business is it of ours? Why would they divulge such extremely sacred and secret information and put it in books available to the whole world? This is a central part of the emphasis of Pseudo-Theosophy; it has nothing to do with Genuine Theosophy and one can find no such emphasis or focus in the work and writings of H.P. Blavatsky.
For further clarification, we would recommend a careful reading of the article “Original Theosophy and Later Versions (Five Main Distinctions to be Considered)” at https://blavatskytheosophy.com/original-theosophy-and-later-versions/. We quote a relevant passage below:
– – –
Although the original teachings of Theosophy refer at times to the fact that there ARE Masters, Mahatmas, Adepts, and Initiates, who are the guardians and custodians of the Esoteric Doctrine and its timeless truths, the emphasis is always without fail on the Philosophy itself and not on the Masters.
Neither HPB, WQJ, nor the Masters themselves, ever divulged details and information about the roles, tasks, locations, past lives, hierarchical positions, levels, and grades of initiation of the Masters. Certain later teachers and writers did exactly this, including drawing up and publishing complex charts and diagrams which purport to show the inner workings of the hierarchical structure of the Great Brotherhood of Masters.
They also published detailed accounts of the physical appearances of the Masters and some described their supposed meetings and intimate friendliness with some of these Masters, whilst at the same time inventing various “new” Masters who are not found described or referred to in those positions in the original Theosophical literature, such as the “Master Jesus,” “The Venetian,” “Master R.,” “Master P.,” “Master Jupiter,” etc.
There was also the insertion of Sanat Kumara as “The Great King, the Lord of the World,” the distortion of the true nature and role of the Maha Chohan, the anthropomorphisation of the Manu, and the exalting of “Christ-Maitreya” to the position of Master over the other Masters, who are frequently described as being the faithful “servants and disciples of Christ” and favouring ritualism, ceremonial, and the Christian Church, whilst Buddha is pushed well into the background, along with genuine Eastern esotericism.
Original Theosophy does not revolve around a cult of the Masters nor their supposed pictures and portraits but rather around the life-giving, soul-satisfying, all-encompassing Esoteric Philosophy and Spiritual Science which the actual Masters gave to the world in the closing quarter of the 19th century through the one they called their “Direct Agent,” H.P. Blavatsky.